Re:Typst: A Possible LaTeX Replacement
by noelwelsh on Saturday September 27, 2025 @05:17AM
(#45394323)
Depends what you want to do, but Typst has replaced Pandoc for the book [1] I'm writing.
[1]: https://github.com/scalawithcats/scala-with-cats/tree/featur...
Re:Typst: A Possible LaTeX Replacement
by cbolton on Saturday September 27, 2025 @05:37AM
(#45394387)
I moved from Pandoc+Lua filters to Typst. Having the scripting language integrated is just nicer, though I sometimes miss the separation between data (from Pandoc markdown) and code.
Re:Typst: A Possible LaTeX Replacement
by 3036e4 on Saturday September 27, 2025 @06:13AM
(#45394538)
Is it as good for generating EPUB or HTML for instance? Or just plain text?
Re:Typst: A Possible LaTeX Replacement
by cbolton on Saturday September 27, 2025 @07:28AM
(#45394866)
I use it to generate PDF. The last release introduced experimental HTML output which is promising but still immature. Work on EPUB support hasn't started as far as I know but it's on the roadmap, and I guess it will be relatively easy once the ongoing work on HTML and accessibility is done.
* Submitted too fast. A quick search tells me Pandoc already added Typst input and output support (e.g. https://pandoc.org/typst-property-output.html), so guess I need to look into if I should switch to use that for generating PDFs.