News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:US Cities Are Paying Too Much for New Transit Buses by hibikir on Friday September 26, 2025 @05:01PM (#45390979)
Even when it's not the insurer, it's at least a hospital. Many a doctor around me that used to have a private practice sold to one of the hospital chains, as they promised more money than by owning, solely due to superior collective action advantages. A large insurer can bully a private practice into cutting costs, but a hospital network that handles 40% of ERs in the metro area? The insurance company can lose. So everyone makes more money but the people paying insurance.
Re:US Cities Are Paying Too Much for New Transit Buses by dnissley on Friday September 26, 2025 @08:25PM (#45392376)
On top of that the ACA prevents new physician owned hospitals from being established and placed restrictions on expansions of existing ones
Re:US Cities Are Paying Too Much for New Transit Buses by MostlyStable on Friday September 26, 2025 @09:54PM (#45392712)
Are you talking about Certificates of Need? Those have been around for a lot longer than the ACA [0]

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certificate_of_need#History

Re:US Cities Are Paying Too Much for New Transit Buses by estearum on Friday September 26, 2025 @09:19PM (#45392590)
To be fair, this is because there's long-standing [but disputed] evidence that healthcare providers drive up costs/utilization when they can refer to hospitals they have equity stakes in.

Messy business!