News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Starbucks: Location closures and elimination of roles. Parent comment

Re:Starbucks: Location closures and elimination of roles by betaby on Thursday September 25, 2025 @02:19PM (#45376745)
> taste burnt

It was the case since forever ( ~15 years+ ). Starbucks is not a speciality coffee shop. There is nothing wrong with that. One has to acknowledge that high volume coffee shops have to rely on basically burned beans in order to be consistent with the taste.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Starbucks: Location closures and elimination of roles by YawningAngel on Thursday September 25, 2025 @02:29PM (#45376897)
Coffee is inherently not a consistent drink. The only brewing methods that don't vary significantly with brewer skill and chance are immersion brews, which aren't broadly used in modern coffee shops. It's surely better to not burn the beans to ash and accept some inconsistency than ruin the drink every time
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Starbucks: Location closures and elimination of roles by esseph on Friday September 26, 2025 @01:54PM (#45389205)
Not at all - consistency is what they sell. It's like going to Japan from the US and eating McDonalds. Or eating McDonalds in Mexico. Same food, more or less.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Starbucks: Location closures and elimination of roles by esseph on Thursday September 25, 2025 @02:24PM (#45376807)
This

Over roasted coffee averages the flavor across large harvests and sources, and they expect to dump a bunch of sugar in there anyway.

[ Parent | on HN ]