News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Android can be beautiful. Parent comment

Re:Android can be beautiful by Steko on Monday September 17, 2012 @04:00PM (#4534550)
Wouldn't high end mandates just lead to the low end being dominated by forks?

Wouldn't that be worse for (1) customers, (2) android's reputation and (3) Google?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Android can be beautiful by ajross on Monday September 17, 2012 @04:17PM (#4534635)
Exactly. The free-with-contract market is real, and wants smartphone features. If "Google Android" doesn't want that market (which isn't insane, iOS doesn't want it) then something else will fill the niche, and "AOSP Android" is the most likely candidate.

The grandparent's desire is isomorphic to wanting Google to force users to spend more on their phones so she has to spend less on her software. That's not a good business tactic.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Android can be beautiful by Steko on Monday September 17, 2012 @04:49PM (#4534812)
"AOSP Android"

Warning massive derail... One thing the tech commentariat has slacked off on is better labels for different Android flavors. I'd suggest:

AOSP = "Opendroid" (forkdroid?)

stock Android (Opendroid + Google services/ecosystem) = "stockdroid"

Android + Touchwiz/Sense = "Samdroid"/"Sensedroid"

Opendroid + Amazon services/ecosystem = "Amazdroid"

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Android can be beautiful by caf on Tuesday September 18, 2012 @12:41AM (#4536371)
What I've suggested in the past is that Google introduce a new brand like "Android Platinum" for the high end. For manufacturers to be allowed to use the brand, they'd have to meet requirements on minimum specs and commit to timely OS updates for some period.
[ Parent | on HN ]