Re:Why Local-First Apps Haven't Become Popular?
by avemg on Monday September 22, 2025 @10:11PM
(#45342056)
How will you know that Bob is typing into it if you're offline?
Re:Why Local-First Apps Haven't Become Popular?
by kazinator on Monday September 22, 2025 @10:16PM
(#45342086)
That's a fair question; we here being under a submission aout local-first apps, and al.
Of course, you know the answer: if you're offline, you're not online. Bob gets to type whatever Bob wants, and until you go online, you don't get to overtype anything.
Re:Why Local-First Apps Haven't Become Popular?
by ongy on Tuesday September 23, 2025 @01:12AM
(#45343045)
But the offline enabled property allows exactly that.
Both sides type offline and only sync later. Neither would like their change to just be discarded.
Re:Why Local-First Apps Haven't Become Popular?
by kazinator on Tuesday September 23, 2025 @01:43PM
(#45350394)
I was responding only to the idea of having no conflict resolution: last edit wins (proposedin a great grandparent comment):
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45341335 "We have a local-first app. Our approach? Just ignore the conflicts. The last change wins."
if you can see the edits being made in real time, keystroke by keystroke, that pretty much solves that problem.
As for offline editing, either don't support it (then you're not local-anything obviously) or you can have some lame workflow like "the document was changed by another user ..."
It's like Ethernet conflict resolution: just access the shared medium and detect collisions in real time.