TinyToCS — computer science research of 140 characters or less

Re:TinyToCS — computer science research of 140 characters or... by pbailis on Monday September 17, 2012 @01:16PM (#4533609)

I agree--we definitely opted for a more traditional publication format in this first iteration. We've been thinking of how to fix this and were considering something like HackerNews for publicly-accessible articles (e.g., arXiv). Do you have any other ideas?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:TinyToCS — computer science research of 140 characters or... by dcoetzee on Monday September 17, 2012 @07:44PM (#4535484)

I would also consider asking authors at the time of submission to explicitly release articles under a Creative Commons license such as CC-BY or CC0. That would enable a lot of fun creative reuses of the works. However some kind of exception may be required for republished works whose copyright has already been transferred to a third party publisher.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:TinyToCS — computer science research of 140 characters or... by pbailis on Monday September 17, 2012 @08:48PM (#4535686)

If you look at the actual papers, they're all under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 already.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:TinyToCS — computer science research of 140 characters or... by krichman on Tuesday September 18, 2012 @01:25AM (#4536495)

Why NC? It's overly restrictive and technically prohibits, say, distributing the papers on a website that has advertising revenue.

[ Parent | on HN ]