Re:Sj.h: A tiny little JSON parsing library in ~150 lines of...
by layer8 on Sunday September 21, 2025 @02:27PM
(#45325314)
Obviously I just did review it, and my conclusion was to not use that code.
In the spirit of the article you linked, I’d rather write my own version.
Re:Sj.h: A tiny little JSON parsing library in ~150 lines of...
by jama211 on Sunday September 21, 2025 @03:28PM
(#45325863)
If it has limitations they should be documented though right? especially if they’re security concerns.
Re:Sj.h: A tiny little JSON parsing library in ~150 lines of...
by knowitnone2 on Sunday September 21, 2025 @09:57PM
(#45328390)
If you review libraries, why do you need to quick scan the issues? You would have already identified all the issues right? Right?
Code is the ultimate specification. I don't trust the docs if the behavior is different from what it's saying (or more often fails to mention). And anything that deals with recursive structures (or looping without a clear counter and checks) is my one of the first candidate for checks.
> has no way to handle the overflow case after the fact.
Fork/Vendor the code and add your assertions.