News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AI Was Supposed to Help Juniors Shine. Why Does It Mostly... by bigfishrunning on Sunday September 21, 2025 @12:19PM (#45324043)
The junior engineer will grow into a senior engineer
Re:AI Was Supposed to Help Juniors Shine. Why Does It Mostly... by TeMPOraL on Sunday September 21, 2025 @03:46PM (#45326018)
Not as fast as models get better.

And not at all for you, because you're unlikely to retain them for long. Which makes this immaterial - AI or human, you're only going to delegate to n00bs.

(This is distinct from the question of which benefits society more, which is a separate discussion.)

Re:AI Was Supposed to Help Juniors Shine. Why Does It Mostly... by bayarearefugee on Sunday September 21, 2025 @01:15PM (#45324681)
> The junior engineer will grow into a senior engineer

And then quit after accepting a new job that pays them their modified value, because tech companies are particularly bad at proactive retention.

Re:AI Was Supposed to Help Juniors Shine. Why Does It Mostly... by arcanemachiner on Sunday September 21, 2025 @03:11PM (#45325721)
Which has nothing to do with the argument you're responding to.
Re:AI Was Supposed to Help Juniors Shine. Why Does It Mostly... by jakimfett on Monday September 22, 2025 @12:38AM (#45329133)
Only if you take the argument entirely out of context.
Re:AI Was Supposed to Help Juniors Shine. Why Does It Mostly... by Kirth on Sunday September 21, 2025 @02:51PM (#45325548)
.. and because the job and environment weren't that pleasant or rewarding to offset that delta in income offered elsewhere at an equally drab employer
Re:AI Was Supposed to Help Juniors Shine. Why Does It Mostly... by fluidcruft on Sunday September 21, 2025 @01:21PM (#45324727)
And then they get their own junior engineers and you get fresh new junior engineers.