News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Meta exposé author faces bankruptcy after ban on criticis... by JKCalhoun on Sunday September 21, 2025 @10:00AM (#45322822)
I don't think that matters in terms of whether it is even enforceable. I could sign a document allowing management to take my first born son but them doing so is not legal. "But he signed it!"
Re:Meta exposé author faces bankruptcy after ban on criticis... by loeg on Sunday September 21, 2025 @11:15AM (#45323500)
Re:Meta exposé author faces bankruptcy after ban on criticis... by twoodfin on Sunday September 21, 2025 @10:28AM (#45323042)
Sure. Was that what happened here, or was it an everyday contract to enforce confidentiality in return for some benefit?
Re:Meta exposé author faces bankruptcy after ban on criticis... by cmiles74 on Sunday September 21, 2025 @11:18AM (#45323529)
If people are being forced to sign anti-disparagement agreements “everyday”, I think that is pretty concerning.
Re:Meta exposé author faces bankruptcy after ban on criticis... by twoodfin on Sunday September 21, 2025 @12:28PM (#45324161)
She was forced to sign it?
Re:Meta exposé author faces bankruptcy after ban on criticis... by JKCalhoun on Sunday September 21, 2025 @12:50PM (#45324430)
Hard to know. If she did not sign it was she waiving her severance package? Perhaps she signed it believing it was unenforceable.

I suppose when one side has lawyers, we all need them now?

Re:Meta exposé author faces bankruptcy after ban on criticis... by luckylion on Sunday September 21, 2025 @03:17PM (#45325766)
You could also sign an NDA. And then you'd be bound by that NDA to not disclose the information it is protecting. Should penalties from that should also be non-enforceable because it would limit what you can say?