Slack has raised our charges by $195k per year

Re:Slack has raised our charges by $195k per year by djtango on Friday September 19, 2025 @08:36PM (#45308543)

> Then this spring they changed the terms to every single user without telling us or sending a new contract, and then ignored our outreach and delayed us and told us to ignore the bill and not to pay as late as Aug 29 Then, suddenly, they called us 2 days ago and said they are going to deactivate the Hack Club Slack

This all reads to me like dysfunction and incompetence rather than true malice.

> Yet agile enough to have both their CEO and CPO become aware of and respond in this discussion thread within hours of the thread's creation?

Yes just like the Sev B of Amazon where a customer could email [email protected] and rain pain onto people at Amazon. someone else in the large discussion said that from their own company's analysis for developer advocacy impact this kind of HN front page coverage is equivalent to an 8 figure marketing spend so I imagine this got escalated pretty damn fast.

You're right though that it is janky that the only way to be heard is to go public, but equally the negative PR has probably cost them much much more than the comparative peanuts they were hoping to make from this one account.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Slack has raised our charges by $195k per year by MichaelZuo on Tuesday September 23, 2025 @08:41AM (#45346216)

Someone, or a group of someones, has to be responsible for sending a threat to close down a customers account. (assuming the customer is in fact acting in good faith, honourable, and so on)

Wether that’s giving a serious punishment to one oversealous employee, or a light reprimand to everyone in a department, there has to be some action taken to regain credibility. (along with proof that such action was taken)

[ Parent | on HN ]