Re:Slack has raised our charges by $195k per year
by enriquto on Friday September 19, 2025 @02:15AM
(#45298465)
> "Slack" didn't do anything. A uninformed sales process included (...)
I didn't hit anyone! An uninformed hand, that was at that moment attached to my body, did!
Re:Slack has raised our charges by $195k per year
by tomnipotent on Friday September 19, 2025 @02:38AM
(#45298592)
Maybe you have something actually useful to contribute to the conversation?
Re:Slack has raised our charges by $195k per year
by sethammons on Friday September 19, 2025 @04:30AM
(#45299319)
Woosh?
Re:Slack has raised our charges by $195k per year
by GlacierFox on Friday September 19, 2025 @04:04AM
(#45299135)
Please say you work at Slack and haven't just typed this almost certain time line of events off the top of you head?
"Slack" didn't do anything. A uninformed sales process included a customer it should not have, which was eventually resolved. Terms did end up changing, but for the better.
I'm willing to bet money that no one from the team or even area of the org chart that made that deal are still in that part of the org, or that any of them would have been involved in any situation that would have brought awareness of what was going on. Sales team have relatively high turnover, over like 25% anually. In my experience it's usually the least stable org chart in the company.
> Unlikely to be generations of execs.
There's probably been no less than ~6 executives that have been responsible for sales operations in that time frame, and that the sales process has been revamped and changes to how revenue is generated just as many times.