Jimmy Kimmel Should Have Strong Odds at the Supreme Court

Re:Jimmy Kimmel Should Have Strong Odds at the Supreme Court by bandyaboot on Thursday September 18, 2025 @07:47PM (#45296394)

The author seems to underestimate this Supreme Court’s willingness to make nakedly partisan rulings.

Edit: oh here we go. Partisan first amendment issues were perfectly fine to discuss here when it was about Twitter. But, different ox being gored now, so we’re going to flag this into oblivion. Absolute frauds.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Jimmy Kimmel Should Have Strong Odds at the Supreme Court by nick__m on Thursday September 18, 2025 @08:00PM (#45296467)

I would not blame dang for keeping that flagged. The quality of the one on Gaza was appalling, it must have been really hard to moderate one and this one wasn't going to be much better.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Jimmy Kimmel Should Have Strong Odds at the Supreme Court by soganess on Friday September 19, 2025 @06:56AM (#45300194)

If only; he is not.

Huq is a U Chicago professor of con law and understands what is happening [1]. He is just having a really bad lawyer brain moment as the eroading rule of law crosses the line he probably uses in class as an example of "too far."

1: https://www.law.uchicago.edu/news/aziz-huq-writes-about-libe...

[ Parent | on HN ]