Jimmy Kimmel Should Have Strong Odds at the Supreme Court

Re:Jimmy Kimmel Should Have Strong Odds at the Supreme Court by eth0up on Thursday September 18, 2025 @07:34PM (#45296300)

I could say a lot of mean things about Jimmy. But what good would it do? I can't stand him. But I will stand up for his right to say whatever he says. If this country, this side or that side, on a razor's edge or done gone cosmic can't see what looms in this direction, just take a chance and oppose it while you can. You don't want to live the alternative.

Quite seriously

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Jimmy Kimmel Should Have Strong Odds at the Supreme Court by FredPret on Thursday September 18, 2025 @07:47PM (#45296393)

He has a right to say whatever he says, but surely his private employer have a right to fire him for it?

He has a right to speak his mind, not to have a show.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Jimmy Kimmel Should Have Strong Odds at the Supreme Court by JumpCrisscross on Thursday September 18, 2025 @07:50PM (#45296417)

> surely his private employer have a right to fire him for it?

Short answer: depends on his contract.

Longer answer: if ABC fired him because of illegal threats from Carr, one could construct the argument that ABC and Carr conspired illegally to subvert Kimmel’s First Amendment rights. (Whether this is legal nonsense is beyond me.)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Jimmy Kimmel Should Have Strong Odds at the Supreme Court by FredPret on Thursday September 18, 2025 @08:15PM (#45296562)

That would be wrong, but I think the conservative backlash was such that he'd have been very much fired anyway, FCC or no. People were publishing lists of his advertisers on X to organize a boycott.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Jimmy Kimmel Should Have Strong Odds at the Supreme Court by cosmicgadget on Thursday September 18, 2025 @08:28PM (#45296632)

Murder of someone with late stage cancer is still murder.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Jimmy Kimmel Should Have Strong Odds at the Supreme Court by FredPret on Thursday September 18, 2025 @08:43PM (#45296723)

Good point

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Jimmy Kimmel Should Have Strong Odds at the Supreme Court by bandyaboot on Thursday September 18, 2025 @07:51PM (#45296424)

Did you even read the piece?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Jimmy Kimmel Should Have Strong Odds at the Supreme Court by queenkjuul on Friday September 19, 2025 @02:30AM (#45298552)

The FCC does not have the legal right to threaten him for what he said

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Jimmy Kimmel Should Have Strong Odds at the Supreme Court by FredPret on Friday September 19, 2025 @02:18PM (#45304752)

That seems correct to me as well, but is it really?

I think they're making an argument related to misinformation / lying about a crime, which apparently is against the terms of ABC's broadcast license. I'm evidently not a lawyer.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Jimmy Kimmel Should Have Strong Odds at the Supreme Court by queenkjuul on Saturday September 20, 2025 @03:44PM (#45316680)

They threatened local affiliates' licenses if they didn't pull the show, which isn't making a formal complaint against ABC for misinformation. I'm obviously not a lawyer but nothing about the FCC making informal threats to coerce self censorship seems remotely legal, beyond the fact Kimmel obviously didn't lie about anything

[ Parent | on HN ]