Re:Top UN legal investigators conclude Israel is guilty of g...
by iainmerrick on Wednesday September 17, 2025 @09:20AM
(#45275526)
The full report itself has all the precise detail you're asking for. It's not like the interviewee is insinuating one thing but the report actually says something else. What exactly do you think is being covered up in this interview?
Re:Top UN legal investigators conclude Israel is guilty of g...
by lcnPylGDnU4H9OF on Wednesday September 17, 2025 @04:10PM
(#45280792)
> clumsy with genocide definition
That's not what they said the UN investigator was clumsy with. They said she was clumsy with how she orally delivered their justification for why they think it fits the definition of genocide.
> Firstly, it's accepted by all that genocide is a monstrous crime, an extremely serious crime, which is the killing and destruction of a people in whole or in part.
The UN investigator is saying that the genocide as it's been perpetrated leaves no doubt that it is intentional by observing of the scale and horror of the destruction. "That's why [they] say it has a specific overarching intent."
You're kidding. "Top UN legal investigator" on genocide is clumsy with genocide definition. And not on some detail. She is "clumsy" on the main thing delineating genocide from the other crimes otherwise similar.
That isn't clumsy. That is absolutely incorrect. It isn't "why ... intent" . The intent in genocide is the "why". She obviously knows it, and thus does it deliberately. There is no other explanation here.