Re:Linux phones are more important now than ever
by thmsths on Tuesday September 16, 2025 @10:13AM
(#45262523)
I mean if the goal is to prevent potential malicious apps from taking screenshots automatically; instead of saving a clueless user from themselves or worse getting in the way of legitimate users I believe that the proper solution is to disallow programmatic screenshots while still allowing screenshots when there is the correct button press (and ensure that this cannot be emulated). Windows reserves ctrl-alt-delete as a direct signal to the kernel for security purposes. Why can't android do the same?
Re:Linux phones are more important now than ever
by mdp2021 on Tuesday September 16, 2025 @03:07PM
(#45266495)
> the proper solution
includes the ability from a user to take screenshots programmatically in case of need. You do not want third parties to be able to; you want the User (yourself) to be able to.
Re:Linux phones are more important now than ever
by dzikimarian on Tuesday September 16, 2025 @12:39PM
(#45264578)
It's really stupid idea, that results in photos of sensitive information displayed on my device on other devices that I don't control and sensitive information wrote on paper in random places.
Password fields are inputs. Screens are bi-directional.
Re:Linux phones are more important now than ever
by spixy on Tuesday September 16, 2025 @04:05PM
(#45267265)
Then ask for my fingerprint after screenshot is made.
Re:Linux phones are more important now than ever
by caddzooks on Tuesday September 16, 2025 @09:21PM
(#45270435)
So in other words, the developers of Android could not figure out how to design a system that could distinguish a screenshot that was initiated by the user versus one initiated by software.
Very impressive.
Beyond preventing screenshots, it blacks out the window content in the task switcher, which is useful if someone is looking over your shoulder. This, by the way, is a good way to check if screenshots are allowed. If the window appears black in the task switcher, screenshots won't work.
The idea is similar to the "**" password fields.