News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:macOS Tahoe by ryandrake on Monday September 15, 2025 @01:54PM (#45252833)
You can still get software that installs and works perfectly on Windows 7 (released 16 years ago). Good luck finding software that even installs on Snow Leopard (released 16 years ago), let alone works well.
Re:macOS Tahoe by cosmic_cheese on Monday September 15, 2025 @01:59PM (#45252899)
The flip side of this is that every attempt at advancing the Windows UI framework story beyond win32/MFC and WPF has failed and the platform itself is steeped neck deep in technical debt.
Re:macOS Tahoe by AlexandrB on Tuesday September 16, 2025 @01:43PM (#45265375)
You can't blame this all on backwards compatibility. Microsoft can't just stick to one successor technology and keeps obsoleting every attempt after a few years. With that approach, of course no one is going to move over.
Re:macOS Tahoe by cosmic_cheese on Tuesday September 16, 2025 @02:30PM (#45265988)
That’s one issue, but another is that they don’t make into successors full replacements. They’ve stuck to WinAppSDK aka WinUI for a while now, but it’s missing such basic elements as a datagrid/tableview which makes it difficult to take seriously as a desktop UI framework.
Re:macOS Tahoe by ryandrake on Tuesday September 16, 2025 @05:32PM (#45268380)
Also, they didn't even migrate their own internal dialogs with each replacement. You can still uncover dialog styles all the way back to Windows 95-style if you poke around Windows 11 long enough. Whenever they came out with yet another successor, they haphazardly migrated a handful of P1 components and then called it a day.
Re:macOS Tahoe by kjkjadksj on Monday September 15, 2025 @09:14PM (#45256884)
Snow leopard is a unix based os. There is a ton of software that can still install on it and work fine.
Re:macOS Tahoe by leakycap on Wednesday September 17, 2025 @02:37AM (#45272512)
Easy to say - much, much harder in practice.