News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Safe C++ proposal is not being continued by krater23 on Sunday September 14, 2025 @07:20AM (#45239002)
> You may spend a few hours struggling with the borrow checker, but that saves you countless days of debugging highly non-trivial defects, especially in a larger codebase.

How often do you had issues like that in the last 10 years of your work? Questionable if it's really cheaper for everyone. Other question, is there any really large Rust codebase out there thats older than 10 years? That had time to gather crust of tons of developers to compare with the appropriate C++ codebases? I don't think so.

There are no comments on this comment yet.