News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Memory Integrity Enforcement by ignoramous on Saturday September 13, 2025 @11:16PM (#45237126)
> Google identified several problems that they were not able to solve and thus did not ship it generally.

My lament is, Google did not do enough as Apple has, in that the problems were worth solving (assuming FEAT_MTE4 is them solving those to productize MTE for security).

> "some in the security community" being loud

Think the GrapheneOS authors deserve more respect. They aren't merely "loud", they have shipped features that AOSP later incorporated.

Re:Memory Integrity Enforcement by saagarjha on Monday September 15, 2025 @05:44AM (#45247869)
No, FEAT_MTE4 is just part of it. There's a bunch of implementation work that goes on top of it to make it perform well for consumer devices.