News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Two Slice, a font that's only 2px tall by throwaway808081 on Saturday September 13, 2025 @10:44PM (#45236993)
Like all of language: context.

Why would hair be like 80s synthpop, or potatoes be in any way related to a by-product of honey?

Re:Two Slice, a font that's only 2px tall by xboxnolifes on Sunday September 14, 2025 @03:23AM (#45238157)
Hair can be either waxy or wavy or both.
Re:Two Slice, a font that's only 2px tall by IshKebab on Sunday September 14, 2025 @04:40AM (#45238443)
Her long blond waxy hair blew in the wind.

Context.

Re:Two Slice, a font that's only 2px tall by lelanthran on Sunday September 14, 2025 @06:10AM (#45238766)
> Her long blond waxy hair blew in the wind.

Same question as GP - how can you tell if that was meant to be waxy or wavy?

Re:Two Slice, a font that's only 2px tall by IshKebab on Sunday September 14, 2025 @06:13AM (#45238777)
From the context. Long hair blowing in the wind is a description of beautiful hair. Wavy hair is beautiful; waxy hair is not.

This is very obvious to most people.

Re:Two Slice, a font that's only 2px tall by Biganon on Sunday September 14, 2025 @06:33AM (#45238841)
"I'll have you know that some people find waxy hair beautifully therefore your example is invalid and I am very intelligent"

:nerd:

Re:Two Slice, a font that's only 2px tall by jonathrg on Sunday September 14, 2025 @05:21AM (#45238611)
Her wa[]y hair was a challenge for the hairdresser
Re:Two Slice, a font that's only 2px tall by IshKebab on Sunday September 14, 2025 @06:15AM (#45238779)
I'm not saying the context always disambiguates it. You can have ambiguous sentences even with perfect fonts.
Re:Two Slice, a font that's only 2px tall by oneeyedpigeon on Sunday September 14, 2025 @09:07AM (#45239528)
The judge delivered an ambiguous sentence.