Re:Safe C++ proposal is not being continued
by steveklabnik on Saturday September 13, 2025 @08:41PM
(#45236505)
No, I am saying that safe rust says “if unsafe is correct, safe rust means memory safety.” Profiles does not even reach that bar, it says “code under profiles is safer.”
It’s not about specifics, it’s about the stated goals of profiles. They do not claim to prove memory safety even with all of them turned on.
It’s not about specifics, it’s about the stated goals of profiles. They do not claim to prove memory safety even with all of them turned on.