Re:Vector database that can index 1B vectors in 48M
by ashvardanian on Saturday September 13, 2025 @08:17AM
(#45231445)
Lucene is tough to deal with. About 15 hours ago — right when this comment was posted — I was giving a talk at Databricks comparing the world’s most widely used search engines. I’ve never run into as many issues with any other similar tool as I did with Lucene. To be fair, it’s been around for ~26 years and has aged remarkably well... but it’s the last thing I’d choose today.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Vector database that can index 1B vectors in 48M
by cluckindan on Saturday September 13, 2025 @08:54AM
(#45231692)
Interesting, then, that Vectroid would choose to fork it.
Elasticsearch is at least good / at hiding the Lucene zoo under the hood.
Re:Vector database that can index 1B vectors in 48M
by ab5tract on Saturday September 13, 2025 @11:23AM
(#45232833)
Can I ask you which alternatives exist at the layer Lucene occupies?
I went looking around last year and couldn’t really find many options, but I might have been looking in the wrong places.
Re:Vector database that can index 1B vectors in 48M
by ashvardanian on Monday September 15, 2025 @01:08PM
(#45252275)
For Vector Search the top 2 are: Meta’s FAISS and (my) Unum’s USearch.
Lucene powers Elastic, Solr, MongoDB Atlas, AWS OpenSearch, Azure Cognitive Search.
USearch powers ClickHouse, DuckDB, YugaByte, TiDB, ScyllaDB, MemGraph, KuzuDB, Lantern, and a few big closed source names that don’t mention it, as far as I know.
FAISS has the highest usage among Python developers, but if you are indexing large collections you should consider alternatives.