I think you missed my entire point, so much that I thank you for demonstrating it. Rather than some abstract "my parents", I can say "like this."

  > Both teams are corrupt, but in different ways.

Who has denied this? Is this not such an obvious assumption that it need not be explicitly stated? Need I make clear that you and I are not in fact the same person?

This is a given.

  > On my team
  > On the other team

And what? We obviously have decided who we believe the lesser of evils is. That was never the point. The point is that by showing strong devotion to the lesser of two evils is still showing devotion to evil! There's a big difference between begrudgingly choosing between two evils in a rigged game and aligning with that evil.

One does not need always compare. We can both evaluate a single political party by its merits, absent of everything else, while also being able to evaluate how they stand comparatively. In fact, you can't even do the latter without doing the former first!

All you've accomplished is perpetuating the two evils. You perpetuate the evil you vote for my allowing them to excuse their actions in justification of fighting the greater. You have no power to change what you've chosen as greater and you've abdicated the power to make your lesser even less evil, instead choosing to gave it power to become more evil!

Think carefully about what you say. It's not only Siths who speak in absolutes, but evil does thrive on over-simplification.