News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Corporations are trying, and now failing, to hide job ope... by crooked-v on Friday September 12, 2025 @01:27PM (#45224470)
For whatever it's worth, that's been a consistent trend with other things Newsom has vetoed with statements that he considers the vetoed item to be already covered by other laws, including some purely technical legislative things. I think it's likely that he sees himself as trying to keep California bureaucracy from growing indefinitely, especially with his push for things like CEQA process reduction/simplification.
Re:Corporations are trying, and now failing, to hide job ope... by notmyjob on Friday September 12, 2025 @02:22PM (#45225018)
It’s capital, political and financial. Everything costs, got to pay for gerrymandering somehow.
Re:Corporations are trying, and now failing, to hide job ope... by jfengel on Friday September 12, 2025 @05:51PM (#45227177)
Vetoing costs. More than half the legislature voted for it.

It can win you a few friends but you lose more.