News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:John Carmack on Patents by elecengin on Tuesday January 27, 2009 @10:42AM (#452231)
A quick shout-out to the US Patent Examiners - these individuals have technical degrees just like us, and do their best to weed out the crap patents they can. In fact, they are judged (for better or worse) by the number of patents they successfully reject.

They are also now some very overworked individuals. They have only hours to review patents in a diverse set of topics. There is only so much research they can do - a patent written by a master claims writer, no matter how frivolous, is very difficult to reject outright.

If you want to improve patents in the US, you can start by asking your congressperson to increase funding to the USPTO.

Re:John Carmack on Patents by weavejester on Tuesday January 27, 2009 @11:59AM (#452365)
Or ban software patents altogether. That would probably be cheaper.
Re:John Carmack on Patents by jeeringmole on Tuesday January 27, 2009 @08:13PM (#453114)
In the meantime, strike small blows here and there against bad patents by helping examine them:

"Help the USPTO find the information relevant to assessing the claims of pending patent applications. Become a community reviewer and improve the quality of patents."

http://www.peertopatent.org/