News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by dinkumthinkum on Thursday September 11, 2025 @12:55AM (#45207928)
But the question "what is a woman" is trying to get at finding this honesty. Even many allegedly highly educated professors respond to that with the answer "anyone that feels like one," which is an absurd and and demands the obvious response "but what is that thing?" Simply because a position can be correctly assailed with such a blunt question does not mean the criticism is not valid. Of course, it doesn't.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by thephyber on Thursday September 11, 2025 @02:03AM (#45208337)
The professors are likely willing to differentiate between biological sex and gender. Kirk purposefully conflated the two to suit his debate needs.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by ETH_start on Thursday September 11, 2025 @02:48AM (#45208580)
The question doesn't predispose that one consider sex synonymous with gender.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by thephyber on Thursday September 11, 2025 @03:41AM (#45208914)
The question was never the problem. It was always how Kirk chose to respond after the answer.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by ETH_start on Thursday September 11, 2025 @03:53AM (#45209008)
The problem was the answer was self-referential, e.g. "anyone who identifies as a woman"
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by dinkumthinkum on Thursday September 11, 2025 @04:38AM (#45209268)
But you haven't made a point, the question remains: "what is that thing?"