Re:Immunotherapy drug clinical trial results: half of tumors...
by chrisweekly on Tuesday September 09, 2025 @10:58PM
(#45192644)
why professional athletes?
Re:Immunotherapy drug clinical trial results: half of tumors...
by jtoberon on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @12:07AM
(#45193147)
Presumably because they're otherwise very healthy.
Re:Immunotherapy drug clinical trial results: half of tumors...
by ReptileMan on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @12:50AM
(#45193425)
They are rarely at peak healthy. They are just in peak physical shape.
Depending on the sport - strain on muscles, joints, heart
Re:Immunotherapy drug clinical trial results: half of tumors...
by ang_cire on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @02:21AM
(#45193975)
Higher sun exposure, extended exposure to chemicals like pesticides on fields, lots and lots of reasons beyond what most people assume (steroid/ PED use).
Re:Immunotherapy drug clinical trial results: half of tumors...
by hinkley on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @04:23PM
(#45203089)
Those tend to be the ones that “get you” at an older age.
I’m sure there are going to be a lot of retired athletes interested in the metastatic melanoma results here of course, but bone or testicular/ovarian cancer hitting 25 year olds (eg, Lance Armstrong) is just kinda brutal.
And childhood leukemia is the biggest dick of them all.
Re:Immunotherapy drug clinical trial results: half of tumors...
by chrisweekly on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @09:30AM
(#45197361)
(clarifying my earlier Q, addressed to hinckley)
"..cancers that are truly unfair. That try to jump the line. Go after kids, mothers, professional athletes"
Why group athletes with kids and mothers as "unfair" victims of cancer?
And then there are the cancers that are truly unfair. That try to jump the line. Go after kids, mothers, professional athletes. If we can fix those, our relationship with cancer will change. Hope those are the ones we can fix first. Or best.