Re:Why critics of Rails have it all wrong (and Ruby's bright...
by hekker on Thursday September 13, 2012 @06:26PM
(#4518971)
I use Django for my projects and I don't share this opinion on the maturity aspect. Can you explain your statement a bit more? What aspects of Django are immature?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why critics of Rails have it all wrong (and Ruby's bright...
by bascule on Thursday September 13, 2012 @07:20PM
(#4519186)
The release notes for Django 1.4, for example, list support for both Time Zones and Selenium.
Time Zones were added to Rails 2.1 in 2008. selenium-on-rails also debuted in 2008.
Does it not seem strange to you that it took 4 years after Rails for Django to get these features?
Re:Why critics of Rails have it all wrong (and Ruby's bright...
by ch0wn on Friday September 14, 2012 @05:10AM
(#4520840)
There were plenty of extensions that allowed you to use Selenium with Django, I maintained one of them. Django is fairly conservative about including new features into the core that work well as extensions. And this is something I value a lot.
The time zone support, though, was really overdue.
Re:Why critics of Rails have it all wrong (and Ruby's bright...
by dscrd on Friday September 14, 2012 @03:46AM
(#4520614)
Really, if you wanna complain about something that's in Rails and not in Django properly, talk about database migrations.
Re:Why critics of Rails have it all wrong (and Ruby's bright...
by hackerboos on Friday September 14, 2012 @08:38AM
(#4521306)
South...but I agree that database migrations should be part of the Django core.