Re:Pi in the Sky, Artists Fill the SF Bay Area With w/ first...
by mej10 on Thursday September 13, 2012 @03:01PM
(#4517953)
This is a good point as well, and more in line with what the original commenter was asking.
Using pi as a base is even briefly discussed on wikipedia. I had some interest in using e as the basis for a while, since (as is pointed out on wiki) "The base e is the most economical choice of radix β > 1 (Hayes 2001), where the radix economy is measured as the product of the radix and the length of the string of symbols needed to express a given range of values."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-integer_representation#Exam...
Re:Pi in the Sky, Artists Fill the SF Bay Area With w/ first...
by jerf on Thursday September 13, 2012 @03:48PM
(#4518183)
"One could sort of satisfy naturalethic's wish by choosing a numeral system with pi as basis. Then pi would have digit representation '1' in this system."
I'm pretty sure pi comes out to 10 base pi, not 1 base pi.
Re:Pi in the Sky, Artists Fill the SF Bay Area With w/ first...
by blacksmythe on Thursday September 13, 2012 @11:32PM
(#4519916)
Numeral systems are not restricted to the set (base N).
"a numeral system with pi as basis" could be (base pi)pi, where pi =-> '1' and pipi -> '10' and unity -> '0.1'.
Re:Pi in the Sky, Artists Fill the SF Bay Area With w/ first...
by jerf on Friday September 14, 2012 @10:20PM
(#4525007)
I'd refer you back to philh's answer. You can do that and it isn't "wrong", but it is surprisingly uninteresting, as compared to a discussion of irrational or negative or imaginary bases.
Of course it's not a good idea to base your day-to-day numeral system on pi, but I know that at least for irrational bases there are actual applications.