Re:Google gets away almost scot-free in US search antitrust ...
by matthewdgreen on Monday September 08, 2025 @01:00PM
(#45170750)
If you’re a search engine competitor of Google’s, and Google owns the largest browser and mobile OS and pays the remaining browsers to make them the default, your business is vastly less likely to succeed. This holds even if customers could go out of their way to use your service. That’s what I understood this verdict to have determined. Unfortunately the remedy is bad and pointless, but that’s a separate matter.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google gets away almost scot-free in US search antitrust ...
by wer232essf on Monday September 08, 2025 @04:07PM
(#45173274)
reminds me of when I tried to switch to DuckDuckGo for a few months. At first I thought it would be easy: just change the default on my phone and laptop. But on my Android phone, Chrome kept “helpfully” nudging me back to Google whenever I opened a new tab, and even my smart speaker would default to Google no matter what. I ended up constantly battling defaults and hidden settings, and after a while it honestly wore me down.
So even though I technically could switch, the friction made it feel like Google had already won before I started. It’s not that alternatives don’t exist, it’s that they’re buried under a pile of defaults and contracts that make everyday users (like me) give up sooner or later.
Re:Google gets away almost scot-free in US search antitrust ...
by jajko on Monday September 08, 2025 @05:13PM
(#45174072)
That sounds like anticompetitive case or two, anybody?