GPT-5 Thinking in ChatGPT (a.k.a. Research Goblin) is shockingly good at search

Re:GPT-5 Thinking in ChatGPT (a.k.a. Research Goblin) is sho... by bluecalm on Monday September 08, 2025 @03:36AM (#45165554)

Gemini is high on hallucination. When I ask it about my own software it not only changes my own name to a similar one common in my language but also makes up stuff about our team saying some stranger works with us (he works in the same niche but that's about it).

It's annoying when it's so confident making up nonsense.

Imo Chat GPT is just a league above when it comes to reliability.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GPT-5 Thinking in ChatGPT (a.k.a. Research Goblin) is sho... by Moosdijk on Monday September 08, 2025 @03:51AM (#45165641)

>Imo Chat GPT is just a league above when it comes to reliability.

Which is in my option, the #1 metric an LLM should strive for. It can take quite some time to get anything out of an LLM. If the model turns out to be unreliable/untrustworthy, the value of its output is lost.

It's weird that modern society (in general) so blindly buys in to all of the marketing speak. AI has a very disruptive effect on society, only because we let it happen.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GPT-5 Thinking in ChatGPT (a.k.a. Research Goblin) is sho... by bitexploder on Monday September 08, 2025 @11:17AM (#45169380)

I just end up using both for research type things. They both end up doing better on certain topics or types of work. For $20/mo why not both :)

I like ChatGPT as a product more, but Gemini does well on many things that ChatGPT struggles with a little more. Just my anecdotes.

[ Parent | on HN ]