And the fact that after installing Android 4.0.4 on it, it feels like whole new machine (speed-wise) - I really blame webOS here.
The rest of the article is really exciting, and I really hope you can launch and get some traction. I agree that Mozilla is important in this space for exactly the same reasons Firefox was important when it launched. I just think it would be kind to tip your hat to WebOS along the way.
I am not trying to criticize them but there are inherit differences between the two projects. I am thinking Mozilla is also partly betting its reputation of protecting user information while being developer friendly.
The free market will decide of course but at least initially that free market won't be North America.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Boot_to_Gec...
@gcb.
Just curious gcb, you know you are hell banned but keep on posting - why is that? Have you tried appealing?
Of course I can only see you because I keep "show dead" on.
FxOS is all web pages (even the IME!) though currently has the same basic PalmOS launcher model that iOS and Android have; no multitasking window manager.
Enyo2 was released recently and is being incorporated into Open WebOS: http://enyojs.com/
How anyone can stand to use javascript for anything significant is beyond me, but Enyo, and hopefully whatever FxOS uses, can have substantial parts of an app's logic written in something like Coffeescript or Clojurescript.
Yeah, and I find the complete and utter lack of any mention of WebOS in TFA troubling.
> What went wrong? Well, apparently[1] there were some big performance issues
Your link points to insufficient hardware though, not software issues. Hardware which seems to have been the main recurring problem on all WebOS machines (according to reports, there were also issues with the software being shipped far too early for v1.0, against the wishes of the engineers working on it)