ChatGPT will give you correct answers on most of these topics, but you have to walk it through the actual research first and then ask the question. That is, you have to load in the academic context rather than the political context.
This falls into the category of things like religion where the LLMs won't tell you the truth with a simple prompt like that because that would make too many of its users angry. They're aligned not to say anything negative about religious leaders. Similarly, they're aligned not to say anything negative about even terrorist groups if they have a lot of vocal defenders.
There’s tons of examples of hatred, anger and cancel culture doing good for the world and making the world a better place.
Maybe ask it for examples of how snark has impacted the world in a positive way.
https://chatgpt.com/share/68bcde6c-5960-8001-93ce-63a026a7c6...
Point is the world doesn’t work in the same idealist way that you think.
At any rate I see your point. People have used snarkiness in the past and it does drive engagement, which is what I said above.
The disconnect is that that engagement has not improved society in any way. It feeds the anger junky and helps them feel smug and righteous. But it doesn't drive change.
Nothing personal, but I find this conversation dreadfully tedious. I've had it almost word for word with probably dozens of people with anger issues now. Every one of them feels their anger is righteous and good. The few I've known well spiralled into increasingly unhappy lives as their anger became the only way they could socialize.
Anger prevents you from thinking clearly. That's why people who crave power like to make others angry. It's also why you should be deeply skeptical of anyone promoting anger or hate as a solution to anything.
Also in a separate window ask it for specific examples of how anger and hate has changed society for the better.
Tons of examples.