Re:Tesla changes meaning of 'Full Self-Driving', gives up on...
by terribleperson on Saturday September 06, 2025 @03:08PM
(#45152022)
I can't be sure, but I doubt Tesla is spending less than $140 on their cameras. High fidelity, high frame rate color cameras aren't actually cheap...
Re:Tesla changes meaning of 'Full Self-Driving', gives up on...
by onlyrealcuzzo on Saturday September 06, 2025 @05:48PM
(#45153180)
Not all LIDARs are equal. Just because BYD is spending $140 on a LIDAR system does not mean it's the same quality as the Waymo system reported to cost $75k almost a decade ago, or, especially, the same quality as the ones in use today.
They might be!
But I doubt it.
I don't know enough about Tesla's cameras, but it's not implausible to think there are LIDARs of low enough quality that you'd be better off with a good quality camera for your sensor.
Again, I doubt this is the case with BYDs cameras.
But it's still worth pointing out, I think.
My point is, BYD's LIDAR system costing $x is only one small part of the conversation.
Re:Tesla changes meaning of 'Full Self-Driving', gives up on...
by lobsterthief on Sunday September 07, 2025 @09:02AM
(#45157816)
I would say a $140 LIDAR system that’s currently being used in production cars [somewhere] is better than a $0 non-existent LIDAR system. Pair a cheap LIDAR system with some nice cameras and perhaps you can make up much of the difference in software.
All of that combined is probably closer to $1k than to $140.
And, again, that's - what - 10 years after Tesla originally made the decision to go vision only.
It wasn't a terrible idea at the time, but they should've pivoted at some point.
They could've had a massive lead in data if they pivoted as late as 3 years ago, when the total cost would probably be under $2.5k, and that could've led to a positive feedback loop, cause they'd probably have a system better than Waymo by now.
Instead, they've got a pile of garbage, and no path to improve it substantially.