Unit Testing: Is There Really Any Debate Any Longer?

Re:Unit Testing: Is There Really Any Debate Any Longer? by markmm on Wednesday September 12, 2012 @08:33AM (#4510286)

Yes come on, does anyone still think they are useful and simply not a complete waste of developer time?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Unit Testing: Is There Really Any Debate Any Longer? by lucian1900 on Wednesday September 12, 2012 @08:53AM (#4510366)

I can't decide if you're serious and misguided or just joking.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Unit Testing: Is There Really Any Debate Any Longer? by batista on Wednesday September 12, 2012 @09:44AM (#4510593)

You know, actual luminaries in our field are also against them. I've seen UNIX programming gods among men dismiss them. It's not like it's a clear cut issue.

For some things like libraries and such, there are absolutely needed, but unit testing everything and especially TDD are stupid.

To be frank, they mostly sound like some Java EE-like monstrosity that for some bizarro reason caught on with the hip crowd too. I'd put them out there with FactoryOfFactory and XML documentation...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Unit Testing: Is There Really Any Debate Any Longer? by viraptor on Wednesday September 12, 2012 @09:55AM (#4510652)

When I think about UNIX programming gods, I think about people who deal with tools that are never modified, deal with very small problems. They're trivial to test functionally, but are next to impossible to test internally (have you ever seen source for tools like tar?)

It's definitely some solution for testing. But when you're writing a webservice, you should think twice before assuming that anything a "UNIX programming god" says is a good advice for you.

[ Parent | on HN ]