News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:It’s Opus, it rocks and now it’s an audio codec standard by masklinn on Wednesday September 12, 2012 @04:27AM (#4509689)
> Using low bit rate Opus may yield a 3MB file for a song, were as FLAC may end up being 150MB for the same audio.

3MB will get you POTS-quality audio though. Lossless codecs usually compress audio to half the original size (so a 150MB FLAC file — for music — will correspond to ~300MB of raw bitstream). Lossy compression to something worth listening to will usually be around 10x compression, so ~30MB for an original 300MB bitstream.

A 35mn song compressed in 3MB probably won't be worth listening to.

Re:It’s Opus, it rocks and now it’s an audio codec standard by ZoFreX on Wednesday September 12, 2012 @07:24AM (#4510120)
If you were using AAC (or anything else that's more advanced than MP3) a 3MB file would actually be listenable for a short song.

A 150MB FLAC file would be about 20-30 minutes long (based on a typical bitrate of 700-1000 kilobits per second).

Re:It’s Opus, it rocks and now it’s an audio codec standard by masklinn on Wednesday September 12, 2012 @09:57AM (#4510657)
> If you were using AAC (or anything else that's more advanced than MP3) a 3MB file would actually be listenable for a short song.

Even mp3 works for "a short song", that's not the context of my comment though, its context is a 150MB FLAC file (~300MB bitstream) recompressed to 3MB with Opus.

> A 150MB FLAC file would be about 20-30 minutes long

A point I noted in my comment.

Re:It’s Opus, it rocks and now it’s an audio codec standard by ZoFreX on Wednesday September 12, 2012 @11:51AM (#4511218)
Oops, I misread your comment quite heavily. Apologies for the extremely redundant follow-up!