Re:Can Cheaper Lasers Handle Short Distances?
by nullc on Saturday August 30, 2025 @07:17PM
(#45078863)
> If you’re using fiber optic cables, that’s 5-10k pairs, in 32U.
not with 4 or 12 core MCF!
Re:Can Cheaper Lasers Handle Short Distances?
by bc569a80a344f9c on Saturday August 30, 2025 @07:25PM
(#45078906)
Fair! Would still be a nightmare to manage, though. I wish they had some details on the proposed alternative waveguide.
Re:Can Cheaper Lasers Handle Short Distances?
by DarkSucker on Saturday August 30, 2025 @08:56PM
(#45079388)
I think the alternative is shown in figure 2. SiN (silicon nitride) is different from optical fiber. Both versions shown in figure 2 lack detail, especially in the small boxes labeled GC, Mirror, and PD. Depending on the details, one might put micro optical assemblies between or in those boxes in the figure. In any case, SiN waveguides are small, so you can pack many lanes in a small space.
Re:Can Cheaper Lasers Handle Short Distances?
by deepnotderp on Saturday August 30, 2025 @10:12PM
(#45079728)
MCF has a bunch of challenges, eg no good pigtail connector, need for rotational alignment, inability to radix (MCF is great for point to point, less good if you want to fan out from one chip to multiple chips), etc
And then even after all that, it’s still 1-2 orders of magnitude lower density than waveguides
Just getting VCELs to 25G per lane would be nice, though, if you can match current prices. Upgrading to 100G-SR4 on the same cable plant would be nice.