News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Working from Home: Why It Sucks by gravitycop on Monday January 26, 2009 @09:49AM (#450437)
You don’t get rich feedback when communicating over a phone, email, or text chat.

Then don't use those. Use immersive telepresence, instead. http://www.hp.com/halo/introducing.html

Re:Working from Home: Why It Sucks by cschneid on Monday January 26, 2009 @12:29PM (#450689)
You're advocating a $100k+ teleconference room to people who work from home?

The tech is awesome, and I've used HP Halo rooms, but they really aren't meant for home deployment. There's just too much physical setup needed (aligning cameras, tvs, etc) that I doubt it'll ever work for that purpose.

Re:Working from Home: Why It Sucks by gojomo on Monday January 26, 2009 @01:48PM (#450803)
In a few years, $100K systems will be $1K; a few years after that, $100.

And some of the people here could help make it happen. (What if digital picture frames or pocket-size projectors had auto-focus, auto-pan cameras, and however many you positioned in a single room auto-configured themselves for optimal telepresence effect? Etc.)

So it's a valid suggestion from a speculative perspective, even if we know a single home worker isn't likely to buy one of these top-end systems today.

Re:Working from Home: Why It Sucks by brk on Monday January 26, 2009 @09:53AM (#450442)
Nice suggestion, but hardly practical.
Re:Working from Home: Why It Sucks by ggruschow on Monday January 26, 2009 @10:09AM (#450465)
How different is it than people just using iMacs with iChat video?
Re:Working from Home: Why It Sucks by lliiffee on Monday January 26, 2009 @10:20AM (#450477)
Much higher quality. There is something in our animal selves that demands a certain threshold of realism, which these new systems have. Technically, it's just higher resolution, faster connections, better screens, better cameras, etc., but the total effect is greater than the sum of parts, as in the system replaces plane tickets instead of phone calls.

This article in the economist was good, but now behind a pay-wall: http://www.economist.com/business/displaystory.cfm?story_id=...

Re:Working from Home: Why It Sucks by gravitycop on Monday January 26, 2009 @10:21AM (#450478)
A major factor in telepresence immersion is eye-contact. http://www.google.com/search?q=telepresence+eye+contact Perhaps someday a YC company will figure out how to inexpensively enable eye-contact over ordinary video chat (teleconferencing).
Re:Working from Home: Why It Sucks by samlittlewood on Monday January 26, 2009 @04:34PM (#451078)
Re:Working from Home: Why It Sucks by gravitycop on Monday January 26, 2009 @10:21PM (#451557)
That's the half-silvered mirror solution (for full eye-contact teleconferencing). I was thinking of the other solution: the software-based one that corrects the images in terms of pupil-direction.
Re:Working from Home: Why It Sucks by jjs on Tuesday January 27, 2009 @04:46AM (#451870)
That could get really creepy, really fast..
Re:Working from Home: Why It Sucks by gravitycop on Tuesday January 27, 2009 @04:48AM (#451872)
It seems to be what HP and Cisco are using for their immersive telepresence systems. I have seen plenty of rave reviews of Halo, and never any complaints.
Re:Working from Home: Why It Sucks by gravitycop on Monday January 26, 2009 @09:55AM (#450445)
Will the practicality likely increase over time?