News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: Why isn't this site as successful as Craigslist? by andrewljohnson on Monday January 26, 2009 @06:26AM (#450287)
Network effects is as glib an answer as "got there first."

These things can be a factor, but are not an explanation.

Re:Ask HN: Why isn't this site as successful as Craigslist? by foulmouthboy on Monday January 26, 2009 @11:04AM (#450543)
I don't know why first mover advantage wouldn't be a good explanation for this case. Just because other companies squandered their first mover advantage doesn't mean they didn't have it initially. The big barrier to entry for a Craigslist competitor would seem to be brand identity since people want to buy and sell where they know other people are buying and selling. First mover advantage plays a big part in establishing that brand identity.
Re:Ask HN: Why isn't this site as successful as Craigslist? by tokenadult on Monday January 26, 2009 @11:08AM (#450551)
"Got there first" is an explanation. It's an explanation of why some American pioneers became rich in railroads and slightly later arrivals didn't, for example.
Re:Ask HN: Why isn't this site as successful as Craigslist? by davidw on Monday January 26, 2009 @06:30AM (#450291)
It's not the only factor, but it's an important one.
Re:Ask HN: Why isn't this site as successful as Craigslist? by mhartl on Monday January 26, 2009 @11:12PM (#451625)
I'd say "got big first" is a slightly more accurate phrasing, but the gist is the same.