Re:Google's Liquid Cooling
by Legend2440 on Monday August 25, 2025 @03:43PM
(#45018108)
The environmental impact of water usage seems way overblown to me.
Last year, U.S. data centers consumed 17 billion gallons of water. Which sounds like a lot, but the US as a whole uses 300 billion gallons of water every day. Water is not a scarce resource in much of the country.
To be clear all talk of water usage has been focusing on local usage which isn't well represented by national numbers.
Re:Google's Liquid Cooling
by abdullahkhalids on Monday August 25, 2025 @06:19PM
(#45019815)
Yeah. There are metrics for how water stressed a community is. We know where data centers have been built, and we know how these water metrics have changed over time.
The correct metric is something like, what's the probability that the launch of data center in a location results in nearby communities to drop significantly in these water metrics.
Personally, I agree. That said, I think it might be worth considering the impact of water usage in local areas that are relatively water constrained.
It seems like a very minor problem next to the huge super obvious one, electricity use.
Google uses plenty of water in cooling towers and chillers. Sure, water cooling loops to the server may reduce the amount a little bit compared to fans, but this isn't "recycling" in any normal sense.
It's mostly a play for density.
Re:Google's Liquid Cooling
by quickthrowman on Monday August 25, 2025 @05:45PM
(#45019431)
Google almost certainly uses evaporative cooling towers, it’s almost twice as efficient as air cooled chillers by themselves.
Google wants you to know it recycles its water. It's free points.
Edit: to clarify, normal social media is being flooded with stories about AI energy and water usage. Google isn't greenwashing, they're simply showing how things work and getting good press for something they already do.