News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:In-Memory Filesystems in Rust by IshKebab on Monday August 25, 2025 @06:04AM (#45012194)
I guess the overhead from the syscalls simply wasn't that significant. Syscalls aren't that slow (~0.5us). This never says how many you were doing.
Re:In-Memory Filesystems in Rust by ozgrakkurt on Monday August 25, 2025 @06:28AM (#45012334)
Also kernel code is probably more optimized than a mock library
Re:In-Memory Filesystems in Rust by jitl on Monday August 25, 2025 @11:44AM (#45015115)
wat. a write to address in memory + a context switch is not going to beat a write to an address in memory