News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A visual history of Visual C++ by philiplu on Saturday August 23, 2025 @01:57AM (#44993589)
No, there were two devs working on the 68k Mac compiler, with ~10 devs on the x86 side (though both targets shared a lot of code and differed mainly in the late codegen and peephole optimization phases). I never worked on the 16-bit code; the 32-bit and later 64-bit x86 backend was a different codebase from the 16-bit stuff.
Re:A visual history of Visual C++ by daemin on Saturday August 23, 2025 @03:53AM (#44994159)
Any idea how many devs are working at Microsoft on the C and C++ compilers these days? I've heard rumours that there's more on the Rust team and that C++ is taking a back seat.
Re:A visual history of Visual C++ by philiplu on Saturday August 23, 2025 @04:13AM (#44994268)
No clue. I left as a full-time employee in 2007, did a few contractor gigs with various old teams of mine to help out, but that was done by 2013. I lost touch with how things were going internally after that.
Re:A visual history of Visual C++ by becurious on Sunday August 24, 2025 @02:24AM (#45001857)
If I remember from poking around at the 16 bit version in that timeframe (1.52?) there was still an option to generate P-code and (this is now nearly thirty years ago) that was used by Excel to minimize code size for the segmented 16 bit systems.