Re:Problems with Lisp
by Retric on Sunday January 25, 2009 @09:19PM
(#449902)
Some things come down to personal preference, but I don't think OCaml's static type system is more useful than Lisp's approach for parsers / compilers. Granted if your building avionics then type safety is important, but in the more normal case it's just not that useful.
Haskell is a pure functional language which is great for maintaining systems but I don't think it's a real benefit when writing them. If you want to write Lisp as a functional Language you can but when it's useful to break that mold you can.
PS: There is probably a better language out there for this stuff, but I don't know of it.
Haskell is a pure functional language which is great for maintaining systems but I don't think it's a real benefit when writing them. If you want to write Lisp as a functional Language you can but when it's useful to break that mold you can.
PS: There is probably a better language out there for this stuff, but I don't know of it.