Re:From GPT-4 to GPT-5: Measuring Progress in Medical Langua...
by munchler on Thursday August 21, 2025 @10:19PM
(#44980404)
Does it matter from a practical point of view? It's either true understanding or it's something else that's similar enough to share the same name.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:From GPT-4 to GPT-5: Measuring Progress in Medical Langua...
by axdsk on Thursday August 21, 2025 @10:49PM
(#44980553)
The polygraph is a good example.
The "lie detector" is used to misguide people, the polygraph is used to measure autonomic arousal.
I think these misnomers can cause real issues like thinking the LLM is "reasoning".
Re:From GPT-4 to GPT-5: Measuring Progress in Medical Langua...
by dexterlagan on Friday August 22, 2025 @07:32AM
(#44983226)
Agreed, but in the case of the lie detector, it seems it's a matter of interpretation. In the case of LLMs, what is it? Is it a matter of saying "It's a next-word calculator that uses stats, matrices and vectors to predict output" instead of "Reasoning simulation made using a neural network"? Is there a better name? I'd say it's "A static neural network that outputs a stream of words after having consumed textual input, and that can be used to simulate, with a high level of accuracy, the internal monologue of a person who would be thinking about and reasoning on the input". Whatever it is, it's not reasoning, but it's not a parrot either.