The idea that something that can't handle simple algorithms (e.g. counting the number of times a letter occurs in a word) could magically churn out far more advanced algorithms complete with tests is… well it's a bit of a stretch.

It's terrible at executing algorithms. This, it turns out, is completely disjoint from writing algorithms.

It cannot do anything on its own, it's just a (very complex, probabilistic) mechanical transformation (including interpolation) of training data and a prompt.

Advertising autocomplete as AI was a genius move because people start humanizing it and look for human-centric patterns.

Thinking A"I" can do anything on its own is like seeing faces in rocks on Mars.