News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on AI tooling must be disclosed for contributions. Parent comment

Re:AI tooling must be disclosed for contributions by eschaton on Thursday August 21, 2025 @06:06PM (#44978669)
Tough shit, if you want to contribute to a project where I’m a maintainer or above you in the corporate org chart, you’ll have to deal with it.

That you refuse to engage with it just raises red flags about what other rules you might be willing to violate if you don’t see a risk of getting caught.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AI tooling must be disclosed for contributions by macawfish on Thursday August 21, 2025 @06:16PM (#44978754)
I'd way sooner quit my job / not contribute than deal with someone who projects on me the way you have in this conversation.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AI tooling must be disclosed for contributions by eschaton on Thursday August 21, 2025 @06:20PM (#44978790)
Enjoy being found out for fraudulently passing off work you didn’t do as your own then.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AI tooling must be disclosed for contributions by macawfish on Thursday August 21, 2025 @06:27PM (#44978855)
Ironically as a practice I'm actually quite transparent about how I use LLMs and believe that destigmatising open conversation about use of these tools is actually really important, just not that it's a useful heuristic for whether or not some code is slop.
[ Parent | on HN ]