News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Uv format: Code Formatting Comes to uv (experimentally). Parent comment

Re:Uv format: Code Formatting Comes to uv (experimentally) by nikisweeting on Thursday August 21, 2025 @06:05PM (#44978667)
You realize this is just a shortcut for one of those "time-tested" options, right? ruff format is already widely used.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Uv format: Code Formatting Comes to uv (experimentally) by calmbonsai on Thursday August 21, 2025 @07:59PM (#44979645)
But why bundle? It makes zero design sense to me.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Uv format: Code Formatting Comes to uv (experimentally) by nikisweeting on Thursday August 21, 2025 @08:58PM (#44979999)
go fmt, cargo fmt, deno fmt, dart format, etc. it's hardly a new trend to ship a formatter with an all-in-one package manager for a language. It's convenient for new projects to not have to set up an additional dependency.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Uv format: Code Formatting Comes to uv (experimentally) by RossBencina on Friday August 22, 2025 @12:16AM (#44980945)
I'm not clear on this, but does it not also setup a backward dependency between the new project and uv?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Uv format: Code Formatting Comes to uv (experimentally) by nikisweeting on Friday August 22, 2025 @03:27AM (#44981853)
Oh no I would hate to have to depend on my package manager and build system
[ Parent | on HN ]