News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Rick Falkvinge: Why free speech is harmed by the ban on c... by cantankerous on Sunday September 09, 2012 @02:35PM (#4496510)
I'm not sure about your locale, but I know in my state you can petition the courts to have yourself removed from the sex offenders registry. It's a case-by-case thing, but it gives some hope to people like your family member, people who got busted for public urination, and other people who probably shouldn't be grouped in the same category as pedophiles.
Re:Rick Falkvinge: Why free speech is harmed by the ban on c... by koide on Sunday September 09, 2012 @04:03PM (#4496800)
I'm sorry, but in the US public urination puts you on the sex offenders registry?

I don't know whether to laugh or cry at those urolagnic law writers.

Re:Rick Falkvinge: Why free speech is harmed by the ban on c... by Johngibb on Sunday September 09, 2012 @10:00PM (#4497915)
Peeing in a park where there could has been children can put you on the list, with the rationale being that while urinating in public you're also potentially exposing yourself to children. It's definitely outrageous that it's on the same scale, but it's not like peeing on a dark alleyway at 3 am will do it.
Re:Rick Falkvinge: Why free speech is harmed by the ban on c... by koide on Monday September 10, 2012 @12:24AM (#4498304)
I did some light research about the subject after I stopped laughing and crying.

It seems like it depends on the state, there are 13 states that have the "public urination leads to sex offense" regulation. Of those only 2 states have the "near a minor" clause. So 11 states can put you there for peeing in public, no strings attached. On those, you would be at the mercy of the police officers that catch you.

Also, I found out that the reason for the "public urination is a sex offense" is not urolagnia (at least it's not overt urolagnia), but a means to deter the flashers' defense "I was peeing, officer." Not sure it makes a lot of sense.

Disclaimer: As I said, this was light research on the topic, so there might be errors. Sources were mostly Straightdope forums and the Wikipedia, IIRC.

Re:Rick Falkvinge: Why free speech is harmed by the ban on c... by jahmed on Monday September 10, 2012 @04:02AM (#4498783)
I tend to agree with getting put on some kind of shame list if you get caught urinating in public though. If you're regularly getting caught pissing in bushes you are obviously really bad at not having people see you pissing in bushes.
Re:Rick Falkvinge: Why free speech is harmed by the ban on c... by koide on Monday September 10, 2012 @05:08AM (#4498931)
I'm not opposed to what you say, the big problem I expect you agree with is mixing (and thus equating) the "urinators" with the rapists.
Re:Rick Falkvinge: Why free speech is harmed by the ban on c... by Torgo on Monday September 10, 2012 @03:44PM (#4501800)
While this helps, unfortunately there is a burgeoning business of websites that scrape offender lists and re-publish them, and will not remove your name unless you pay them money. There weas one a while back that would actually contact people on the list threatening to put up flyers in their neighborhood unless you paid. Note that this is regardless if your status on the official list has changed. There is no substitute for keeping people off these lists if they never should have been on them in the first place.