News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Lab-Grown Salmon Hits the Menu at an Oregon Restaurant as... by rayiner on Tuesday August 19, 2025 @12:25AM (#44948245)
Other than the genetic engineering and solvent-based extraction of canola oil. But yes, that was my parents reaction as well. Regardless, it’s just butter, ghee, and sometimes olive or avocado oil at my house. Because food and cleanliness taboos are sub-scientific.
Re:Lab-Grown Salmon Hits the Menu at an Oregon Restaurant as... by bowmessage on Tuesday August 19, 2025 @02:19AM (#44948759)
Totally agree with you. I do not understand how this viewpoint upsets people.
Re:Lab-Grown Salmon Hits the Menu at an Oregon Restaurant as... by shlant on Tuesday August 19, 2025 @03:53AM (#44949288)
ant-seed oil is anti-scientific and prays on people being ignorant about the research on health outcomes and relies on emotional appeals and appeals to nature such as "the genetic engineering and solvent-based extraction of canola oil".
Re:Lab-Grown Salmon Hits the Menu at an Oregon Restaurant as... by bowmessage on Tuesday August 19, 2025 @11:27AM (#44952695)
Calling the rejection of a novel highly processed food replacement like this anti-scientific is comically illogical.
Re:Lab-Grown Salmon Hits the Menu at an Oregon Restaurant as... by tptacek on Tuesday August 19, 2025 @11:51AM (#44952986)
Who are you trying to kid? You listed sunflower seed oil alongside canola --- you're presumably just as opposed to mustard seed oil.

It would be funny if the one seed oil you're OK with is mustard seed oil, the oil closest in composition to canola, the one oil anyone has a legit gripe about (it doesn't taste very good).

Re:Lab-Grown Salmon Hits the Menu at an Oregon Restaurant as... by shlant on Sunday August 24, 2025 @09:58PM (#45009516)
you care more about morally loaded terms than research and call me illogical. ok
Re:Lab-Grown Salmon Hits the Menu at an Oregon Restaurant as... by KempyKolibri on Tuesday August 19, 2025 @03:09AM (#44949022)
I don’t think people eating butter instead of canola oil is what upsets people.

It’s people ignoring the mountain of evidence that such a switch would be a backwards step for health outcomes and claiming the opposite because they read a book by the usual rogues’ gallery of science misinterpreters (Taubes, Teicholz, Shanahan).