News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Lisp in 99LOC by eqvinox on Sunday August 17, 2025 @04:45AM (#44929989)
That's besides my point, which is why I said "structure, not just expression".

It could've used a struct rather than wedging tags into a double's first byte and still be 99 lines.

Re:A Lisp in 99LOC by Spivak on Sunday August 17, 2025 @10:48AM (#44931961)
If that's the trick you object to then you will be sad to hear that Ruby uses it.
Re:A Lisp in 99LOC by fami-com on Sunday August 17, 2025 @01:47PM (#44933408)
That's a standard technique in interpreters. All non-toy Javascript engines use it, for example.
Re:A Lisp in 99LOC by cardiffspaceman on Sunday August 17, 2025 @04:07PM (#44934506)
Nan-boxing is awesome.