News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:South Park creator’s 2007 digital ad revenue sharing clause by graeme on Friday August 15, 2025 @02:22AM (#44909185)
The South Park owners don't have a billion dollars in liquid wealth each. They have ownership of south park, which is worth billions.

If you make them cut their assets down to $100 million each then they don't own South Park. And someone else gets to tell them what to write. Or they retire.

Re:South Park creator’s 2007 digital ad revenue sharing clause by saulpw on Friday August 15, 2025 @02:56AM (#44909360)
The capital gains tax could be 90%+ on any gains over $10m (and 99% over $100m), so they can still sell out, but it would cap liquid wealth at $100m dollars. However, they would still have a billion dollars of ownership, and the societal power that comes with being a billionaire, as they can leverage those assets to great effect without selling them. (As Elon Musk didn't actually pay $44b for Twitter.)

So I wonder if the government could levy a stock tax, in which every public stock was diluted by 1% per year, with non-voting stock going into a sovereign wealth fund. This would make for a gradual transition of companies from capitalist-owned to public-owned.

Re:South Park creator’s 2007 digital ad revenue sharing clause by Imustaskforhelp on Friday August 15, 2025 @04:46AM (#44910003)
Oh I thought that they had that much money in liquid wealth. My bad.